Contribute to environmental outcomes across Australia


Major financial partners


Partners (become a partner)


Top species richness

QPRC LGA field guide

QPRC LGA

12564
0.22 sightings / ha
Namadgi National Park field guide

Namadgi National Park

8130
0.41 sightings / ha
Morton National Park field guide

Morton National Park

5202
0.1 sightings / ha
Tidbinbilla Nature Reserve field guide

Tidbinbilla Nature Reserve

4871
2.46 sightings / ha
ANBG field guide

ANBG

4470
331.23 sightings / ha
Aranda Bushland field guide

Aranda Bushland

4438
52.73 sightings / ha
Mount Ainslie field guide

Mount Ainslie

4257
30.3 sightings / ha
Black Mountain field guide

Black Mountain

4192
23.42 sightings / ha
Wingecarribee Local Government Area field guide

Wingecarribee Local Government Area

3877
0.02 sightings / ha
Mount Painter field guide

Mount Painter

3836
118.52 sightings / ha
Mongarlowe River field guide

Mongarlowe River

3810
0.03 sightings / ha
South East Forest National Park field guide

South East Forest National Park

3764
0.83 sightings / ha
Albury field guide

Albury

3475
1.98 sightings / ha
Ben Boyd National Park field guide

Ben Boyd National Park

3363
0.95 sightings / ha
The Pinnacle field guide

The Pinnacle

3302
112.07 sightings / ha
Bruce Ridge to Gossan Hill field guide

Bruce Ridge to Gossan Hill

3108
25.98 sightings / ha
Mount Majura field guide

Mount Majura

3055
19.5 sightings / ha
Kosciuszko National Park field guide

Kosciuszko National Park

2997
0.01 sightings / ha
Wodonga field guide

Wodonga

2967
0.32 sightings / ha
Nadgee Nature Reserve field guide

Nadgee Nature Reserve

2925
0.87 sightings / ha

Announcements

19 Apr 2024

Hello NatureMaprs,We are desperate for testers. This is call for anyone who'd like to be involved in testing our 4.4.0 mobile update. We need as many testers as possible to ensure the application runs...


Continue reading

NatureMapr Data Management and Privacy Policy update

Exciting mobile app updates under way

Future of NatureMapr survey results and update

Application Testing: Update 4.4.0

Discussion

15 min ago
There are a number of Lasioglossum (Chilalictus) species that are as small as Lasioglossum (Homalictus) which makes it difficult to identify the subgenus without seeing the underside of the abdomen. While the colour of the abdomen is reminiscent of L. (Homalictus) punctatus, neither the colour nor the surface sculpture of the thorax seems to match that species and some L (Chilalictus) species have red on the abdomen. And all that is before taking into account the variable colour of some species.

Lasioglossum sp. (genus)
Pam wrote:
19 min ago
Agree with Ken. Not like even any Boletales I'm familiar with....not to say there arn't things out there I'm not aware of. I'd be tending to think it might be some sort of polypore. Though the colours are interesting! It would be great if a specimen could be collected and looked at microscopically and possibly some DNA work done on it!!?

Boletus sp.
KenT wrote:
5 hrs ago
For several reasons that I will go into, I have doubts that this is a species of Boletus. Unfortunately I have no recent literature on the order Boletales, for the group as as a whole I'm looking back to Singer (1986) and there has been a lot of molecular DNA work over the intervening decades resulting in the recognition of many new genera in this order. The type species for Boletus is Boletus edulis described in 1782, it is ectomycorrhizal and I suspect the species that remain in this genus are also ectomycorrhizal. From what I can make of the images the fungus growing is out of solid looking wood (living? or dead?) suggesting it is likely to be lignicolous and either parasitic or saprophytic and hence unlikely to be Boletus sensu stricto. There are other genera in the Boletales that have saprophytic or parasitic species. Another possible issue is that the image showing the underside of the fungus appears to show the hymenial pores extending all the way down the stipe with no clear delineation between hymenium and stipe. Not a character of Boletus and atypical of the few small pored Boletale genera I am familiar with. This may just be my eyes which are not working well at computer screen distances where things keep drifting in and out of focus.

Boletus sp.
Mike wrote:
Yesterday
I am not sure the asparagus assassin would be big enough to get all the rhizomes. https://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/-/media/OEH/Corporate-Site/Documents/Animals-and-plants/Pests-and-weeds/asparagus-weeds-management-manual-130486.pdf does not include specific treatment for Asparagus officinalis but I have dug out a dense patch, careful to get all rhizomes, then followed up the next year to get seedlings. I have also used stem scrape and poison. However, it is spreading widely and can be hard to find and treat.

Asparagus officinalis
MattM wrote:
Yesterday
I would think this is a wallaby grass given how hairy it is.

Rytidosperma sp.

Explore Australia by region

2,154,471 sightings of 19,955 species in 6,503 locations from 11,461 contributors
CCA 3.0 | privacy
We acknowledge the Traditional Owners of this land and acknowledge their continuing connection to their culture. We pay our respects to their Elders past and present.